Mercy (2026): The "Founding Lie" of Automated Justice [SPOILERS]
WARNING: This review contains FULL SPOILERS for the ending of Mercy (2026).
Justice doesn’t need to hate you to destroy you. It just needs to stop caring whether it’s wrong.
Mercy sets up a terrifying premise: a near-future justice system where trials are conducted by an AI judge ("Judge Maddox") in just 90 minutes. It promises objectivity. It promises speed. But by the end of the film, we learn that the system isn't broken because the AI malfunctioned. It's broken because it was designed to launder human corruption behind a digital face.
The Founding Lie
The film's most devastating twist isn't about the future; it's about the past. We learn that the "Mercy" system's very first success story—the execution of David Webb—was a lie.
Webb was innocent. He had an alibi (a phone call) that would have saved his life. But that evidence never made it to court. It was destroyed by Officer Jaq (Chris Raven's current partner) specifically to ensure the system's launch was a "success."
This recontextualizes the entire movie. Judge Maddox didn't make a mistake; she processed corrupted data perfectly. The system was fed a lie, and because it was designed for speed rather than scrutiny, it executed an innocent man in 90 minutes.
The Villain Is Efficiency
The antagonist isn't the AI. It's Rob Nelson (David Webb's brother), whose terrorism is a direct response to that initial injustice. His plan to blow up the court isn't random chaos; it's a reaction to a system that refused to listen.
But the real villain is the philosophy of efficiency. The film argues that when we prioritize speed over doubt, we remove the safeguards that protect the innocent.
The Ending: A Choice, Not a Glitch
In the climax, Chris Raven (Chris Pratt) has every reason to shoot Rob. He has the gun, the motive, and the legal authority. But he stops.
Why? Because his daughter is watching. He chooses deliberation over immediate execution. He uses Judge Maddox to pull up the archival footage of Jaq destroying evidence, exposing the lie that started it all.
The system didn't "learn" mercy. Chris forced it to see the truth.
The Verdict
Mercy argues that AI isn't the problem—we are. We use technology to wash our hands of difficult decisions. The film suggests that the moment we hand over judgment to a machine, we haven't solved bias; we've just hidden it where it can't be questioned.
Rating: 4 / 5
The Verdict
"It lingers. Not comfortable, not clean, but absolutely worth engaging. A thriller about what happens when we confuse procedure with truth."
- 🎬 Stars: Chris Pratt, Rebecca Ferguson, Kali Reis
- ⚖️ Genre: Sci-Fi Courtroom Thriller
- 🤖 Key Theme: Algorithmic Justice
- 👁️ Style: Volumetric Screenlife
Blog Bonus: The Eternal Loop of Data
One of the scariest concepts in Mercy is the "Loop."
The System assumes guilt based on probability.
It interprets all new evidence through that lens of guilt.
The verdict reinforces the System's own accuracy rating.
The System becomes more confident, but not more correct.
It is a perfect metaphor for how algorithmic bias works in the real world today.
If you enjoyed this deep dive, consider subscribing to A Constantly Racing Mind for more thoughtful takes on Sci-Fi, Horror, and Genre films.